May
15
Our
last full day in Florence we set aside to visit the Uffizi. We had a
reservation at 2 and set out from the hotel around 11, so we took the long way
around.
The
Duomo square was packed, as it has been every morning. All you could see were
the heads of people, putting me in mind of an image I had once seen or heard
about, “Mussolini Speaking to the Ten Thousand.” So I tried it.
The
photo of the day is “Harry Channels Mussolini.”
Nobody
knew what I was doing except that I was posing for the photograph, so I figured
it was safe. Not having been to Italy before, I had no idea of the cultural
wind. I was careful not even to pack a black shirt for this trip. I had no idea
if it would have made some kind of inadvertent political statement. The last
thing I wanted was to be hounded by a bunch of neo-fascist recruiters.
Of
course, the red roots of my youth are showing in the picture. I’m saluting with
my left hand in a fist. That was the solidarity salute of the Spanish left—anarchists,
socialists, communists, republicans, foreigners, and maybe some others besides—in
the days of the civil war.
Aside
from the Uffizi, there was another wonder today. We were somewhere probably in
the neighborhood of the old cathedral, the Basilica of St. Lawrence, when we
saw an old medieval church. There was a panel on the wall inscribed in Latin,
and from what I could make of it, it said, “Karolus francorum rex ...” Wow,
unless my neighbor Karl is a lot older than he owns up to, this has to be—Guess
who—Yes, Charlemagne. He is all over Western Europe, just like Stonewall
Jackson in Virginia. And Western Europe is a bigger place even than Virginia.
Holy Charlemagne, Batman.
Anyhow,
I think the sign said that Charles, king of the Franks, returning from Rome
[where, you may recall, he stood on a maroon dot of marble in St. Peter’s and
was crowned Holy Roman Emperor] entered Florence “cum magno gaudio”—with great
rejoicing. Better and better all the time. It’s like oregano: You can’t get too
much Charlemagne.
We
got to the Uffizi just fine. No photos allowed. This place is like the Louvre,
a little smaller maybe, but just as majestic. It is filled with recovered (or
maybe plundered) Classical statuary. Roman originals, Roman copies of Greek
originals, and some actually Greek.
But
that’s not the draw. The painting galleries are overwhelming. There are a
couple of OK da Vincis, an annunciation
and another that was out for restoration. But that’s OK. I am underwhelmed by
da Vinci’s paintings.
There’s
lots better, Titian’s
Venus, for instance. She is lying on a couch playing with herself and
looking more smug and satisfied even than Pauline (nee Bonaparte) Borghese.
Botticelli’s
“Birth
of Venus” and “Springtime”
are at the Uffizi. It would be arrogant for me to comment on either of these
pieces. So I will. The figure of Flora, or Springtime, in La Primavera looks right
at you. It’s the face of somebody I know. I have no idea who. Maybe someone I
wanted to date when I was a kid or maybe a movie actress. It disturbs the hell
out of me and it’s wonderful.
There
is Ghirlandaio,
also wonderful, whose work I can’t really distinguish from Botticelli’s. But I
think there is a difference. Ghirlandaio’s faces are even more realistic and
the colors of the compositions are a little darker, the color range less
extreme.
I
had heard about Andrea
del Sarto, and maybe have seen some of his work in New York. I have no idea
what he does with the brush, but the paintings look like frescoes, the color in
pixels of sand. It makes the paintings dark, so the faces come out with subtle
depth.
According
to Rick Steves, Michelangelo’s portrayal of the Holy Family
is the only easel painting that Buonarroti ever completed. Michelangelo considered himself a
sculptor and supposedly was reluctant to do the frescoes of the Sistine Chapel.
The
painting at the Uffizi shows Mary, Joseph, and Jesus as beefy figures in bright
colors. John the Baptist as a child watches them fondly in the middle distance,
and the background is a row of naked young men representing, perhaps, the
Classical past. As we know from surviving sculpture from back then, clothes
were optional in ancient times.
We
spent five hours or more in the Uffizi. I don’t remember half of what we saw.
I’m not sure I have the relationshiop of Botticelli’s work and Ghirlandaio’s
right. Maybe I’m mixing up Botticelli with Raphael, or Ghirlandaio with Fra Angelico or
another Fra. There is too much to handle, but mind, I’m not complaining. It was
spectacular. Literally.
Maybe
a lot of it will come back to me in dreams.
We
stopped for crostini and bruschetta, with Chianti of course, outside Palazzo
Vecchio.
The
sun was going down and the towers were shining burnt Siena. That’s a Crayola
shade. Siena is in Tuscany, not far from Florence. I know where they get that
color name now.
With
our antipasti course completed, we strolled along the back streets and came to
Buca Poldo, a ristorante in Chiasso degli Armagnati (I want to find this place
again) with seating downstairs.
We
had penne with meat sauce, which had peas in it. Perfect.
And
braised beef in Chianti sauce. Saying is almost as good as eating it.
The
wine was a half bottle of Ruffino chianti riserva ducale. “Riserva” means that
it is aged extra. Our label was dated 2008. “Ducale” I’m not sure. Maybe “fit
for a duke.”
I
had an open bottle of Chianti classico at the hotel. Wine, like bread,
represents so much human toil. That’s why they are offered as the elements of
the Eucharist. So I couldn’t let that bottle go to waste.
Then
it was good night, all.
No comments:
Post a Comment